The tractate of Avoth is an
integral part of the Talmud. Although its pleasant and easy style makes it
accessible to the layman, it cannot be isolated from the rest of the Talmud.
Avoth assumes a deeper and richer dimension when related to Talmudic issues
elsewhere. The more we know of a sage's historical background, style and
Halachic opinions, the better we can appreciate his ethical advice in Avoth.
Let us use the famous story of Shammai, Hillel and the three converts
(Shabbos 31) to demonstrate the fusion of Halacha and Aggadah,: A gentile
once came to Shammai, and wanted to convert to Judaism. But he insisted on
learning the whole Torah while standing on one foot. Shammai rejected him,
so he went to Hillel, who taught him: "What you dislike, do not do to your
friend. That is the basis of the Torah. The rest is commentary; go and
learn!" Another gentile who accepted only the Written Torah, came to
convert. Shammai refused, so he went to Hillel. The first day, Hillel taught
him the correct order of the Hebrew Alphabet. The next day he reversed the
letters. The convert was confused:"But yesterday you said the opposite!?"
Said Hillel: "You now see that the Written Word alone is insufficient. We
need the Oral Tradition to explain G-d's Word." A third gentile wanted to
convert so he could become the High Priest, and wear the Priestly garments.
Shammai said no, but Hillel accepted him. After studying, he realized that
even David, the King of Israel, did not qualify as a cohen, not being a
descendant of Aaron,
Hillel's welcoming personality complements his saying: "Love people and
bring them close to Torah." (Avoth 1) This story, however, raises several
serious questions, which in turn, will be resolved by the Mishna in Avoth.
a) How did Hillel accept the convert who was attracted by the High
Priest's stature and garments; do we not discourage conversion for ulterior
motives?
b) A convert must be unconditionally committed to the acceptance of all
the Divine and Rabbinical Mitzvos, without exception. How did Hillel convert
someone who did not initially accept the Oral Law?
c) Obviously. a convert must show a serious interest and concern for
Judaism. How did Hillel accept the 'quickie' conversion of someone standing
on one foot, expecting to know it all in a minute? Rashi says that Hillel
felt sure of these converts' sincerity. But how could he be confident, in
view of the unacceptable conditions the converts expressed?
Avoth gives us a better insight into Hillel's mind. "Love people and
bring them closer to Torah." Hillel's personal love for people gave him the
patience and sensitivity to hear what people were really trying to say,
rather than be distracted by superficial impressions. Empathizing with the
soul-searching that attracted them to Judaism, Hillel saw through the outer
facades. Looking into their hearts, he read between their lines, for Hillel
said: "Do not judge a friend until you are in his place!"
The convert was not just acting silly by standing on one foot; he was
actually symbolizing his quest for true unity. This gentile had left behind
a confusing plethora of pagan gods and multiple deities. He searched and
finally found Monotheism, One Torah and One G-d, wanting to live by a single
unifying principle, the 'one foot' on which all else stands. Hillel taught
him that the underlying principle that unites all is Jewish Love. The second
convert, had rejected the other man-made religions as human concoctions, was
attracted to the Divine Torah, which consisted solely of G-d's word. He was
shocked to find that we follow a Rabbinical tradition. He wasn't being
rebellious, but sincerely asking a valid question; "I wish to observe G-d's
word alone, not any human additions." Hillel creatively showed him that the
two Torahs are not two separate systems, but are one and the same. The
written word and the oral traditions complement each other. It is as basic
as the Aleph Bais, where you can't have one without the other. Indeed, the
Torah itself bids us to follow the enactments of the sages. The third
convert, disillusioned with pagan shallowness, aimed for a higher meaning to
life. He yearned to reach the highest level, assuming that being a High
Priest is the ultimate spiritual fulfillment.
But Shammai took people at face value. From his perspective, he
rightfully rejected them. Shammai's original stern attitude helps us
appreciate his statement (1:15): "Welcome everyone with a pleasant face."
Shammai honestly conceded that Hillel's approach was proven right by the
three converts. Yet, even while changing his personal attitude, Shammai
refuses to relax his principles. He insists:"Set yourself a time for Torah
study;" i.e. Torah cannot be learned in a rush, while on the run. Do not
attempt to learn Torah while standing on one foot.
This also explains Hillel's uncharacteristic negative tone in Mishna 13.
The usually kind and gentle Hillel suddenly turns angry and condemning: "He
who doesn't learn deserves death; Whoever doesn't increase, decreases;
Whoever wears the Mantle dies." Didn't Hillel himself tell us: 'An angry
person should not teach' (Avoth 2:5)? And why does Hillel suddenly switch
languages, from the usual Mishnaic Hebrew to Aramaic?
Hillel is here addressing those three converts. They are still taking
Hebrew lessons, so he speaks to them in their native Aramaic. He urges them
to continue learning; not to be satisfied only with the Written law itself,
or to remain standing just on one phrase. He warns against the unauthorized
wearing of the priestly mantle.
This also explains the Mishna (Avoth 5:25): "Ben Bag Bag says: Turn it
and Turn it, for all is in it." The commentaries explain this name BG as an
acrostic of "Ben Ger,' a mysterious convert whose name was omitted to
protect him from Roman persecution. But a clue to his identity may be found
in the name 'Bag Bag,' which lists the Hebrew letters Bet and Gimmel in
alphabetical order. Perhaps he was the convert who accepted Judaism through
the Bet and Gimmel lesson, and then adopted it as his name. He says: "Turn
the Torah, and turn it again." Quite literally, by turning the alphabetical
order back and forth, Ben Bag Bag had learned to fully accept Judaism.
* * *
As the different parts of the puzzle come together, we start to see a
better picture of Shammai and Hillel. By juxtaposing the Aramaic Mishna in
Avoth with a difficult story in tractate Shabbos, it all begins to fall into
place.